From Borrowing Culture to Building It: Why Brands Need to Stop Renting Relevance

  • 4.5× more Consumers will buy from brands that commit to multicultural marketing, not just lip service.
  • Culture-washing kills trust. 73% of Gen Z instantly unfollow brands that “fake relevance” or jump on trends without authenticity.
  • 36% profitability edge.  Companies who push cultural diversity financially outperform peers stuck in homogeneity.
  • The “borrowed relevance” trap. 62% of campaigns chasing short-term hype see engagement collapse within 30 days, with no lasting equity.

What happens when culture becomes collateral in marketing’s endless chase for attention? In 2025, that question is more urgent than ever, and the answer might just redefine brand strategy altogether.

The Shift from Transactional Partnerships to Cultural Stewardship

Gone are the days when a one‑off influencer post or trend‑hijack sufficed. Today’s consumers, especially Gen Z, seek more than surface‑level relevance; they seek resonance. According to a recent Harris Poll Brand Equity tracker, brands winning with Gen Z aren’t just selling, they’re signalling. STŌK, Gymshark, Poppi, Revolve, Coinbase, and SoFi are rising because they tap into values, stories, and habits, not just hype. Cultural relevance isn’t a vibe, it’s a growth strategy.

Risks of Culture-Washing vs. Rewards of Authentic Investment

Brands that chase quick cultural moments without depth often fall prey to “culture‑washing”, a shallow appropriation that lacks sincerity. In contrast, when brands embed themselves in genuine cultural movements, they reap longer‑term equity and loyalty. A striking illustration: consumers are 4.5 × more likely to support brands committed to multicultural marketing – a clear case for investing in cultural inclusivity, not just token gestures.

Are you and your brand Multicultural?

This is more than optics. A McKinsey study shows that companies with top‑quartile ethnic and cultural diversity, outperform their bottom‑quartile peers by 36 % in profitability. Building long‑term cultural equity isn’t just socially right, it’s economically smart.

Case Study: Nike, From Campaigns to Culture

Nike exemplifies cultural stewardship. Beyond flashy slogans, the brand embeds its values across its DNA, whether through sustainability, diversity, or innovation. Its bold CSR targets for 2025 include achieving 50 % representation of women in its corporate workforce, 45 % in leadership, 100 % pay equity, and increased girl participation in key cities.

Additionally, Nike’s sustainability strategy, driven by innovation, is more than greenwashing; it’s rooted in long‑term brand identity and social responsibility.

Such integration ensures that Nike isn’t just borrowing cultural credibility, it’s building it.

Case Study: Netflix, Curating Cultural Conversations

Netflix, too, plays the long game by spotlighting cultural stories through its platform, elevating voices and narratives that shape conversation (for example, via curated collections like the Black Lives Matter series).

Those editorial choices build cultural space rather than merely exploiting trending search terms.

The Strategic Playbook for Cultural Stewardship

  • Invest in micro‑communities: As noted by marketing voices in 2025, the real magic lies in hyper‑local, authentic engagement. “If you’re not showing up for your people, you’re just showing off.”
  • Own your audience: Platforms may own the algorithm, but brands must own the relationship. Building first‑party channels (email lists, communities, content hubs) is the antidote to rented platforms.
  • Embed diverse perspectives: Diverse representation isn’t a checkbox, it’s a strategic asset that boosts trust, avoids missteps, and fuels innovation.

The bottom line is that Brands that build cultural equity, through sustained investment, community connection, and authentic representation, position themselves for enduring relevance and growth. In contrast, those who merely rent relevance risk fading once the trend cycle moves on.

The Question for marketing leaders is “What steps are you taking today to cultivate, not commandeer, cultural relevance?”